Import Duty vs Tariff: What Importers Actually Pay on a China Order

An importer forwards a quote and asks the same question three or four times a month: the supplier said the tariff is 25%, the broker’s estimate shows 28.87%, and the entry summary that finally arrives lists four separate numbers. Is that one charge described three ways, or is the shipment being taxed three times?

It is neither. The short version is that a tariff is a rate published in a schedule, and a duty is money assessed on one specific entry. But that sentence, which is roughly where every other page on this subject stops, does not help anyone reconcile an invoice. What helps is seeing where each word lives on the paperwork, and watching the numbers stack.

Duty vs Tariff: The Distinction That Settles an Invoice Argument

A tariff is a rate that exists before your shipment does. It is printed in a published schedule, attached to a classification code, and it applies to everybody importing that commodity from that origin. Nobody assesses it against you personally — it sits there whether you ship or not.

A duty is what happens when your goods meet that schedule. It is a specific sum of money, calculated on a specific declared value, owed by a specific importer of record on a specific entry. The tariff is the price list; the duty is the bill.

So the practical test is: can it be expressed as a percentage with no shipment attached? If yes, you are talking about a tariff. If it is a dollar figure that only exists because a container arrived, it is a duty.

That test also explains why the words are used loosely without anyone getting hurt. When a supplier says “the tariff on this is 25%”, he means the rate. When your broker says “your duty came to $2,180”, he means the assessment. Both are correct. The confusion only bites when someone reads a rate as a total, or a total as a rate.

Where Each Word Actually Lives on Your Paperwork

This is the part that resolves most invoice arguments, because each term belongs to a different document, and once you know which document you are holding you know which conversation you are having.

That fourth row is where most of the real confusion sits. Buyers reasonably assume that everything customs collects must be “the tariff”, so when the total exceeds the rate they looked up, they suspect an error or a markup. Usually it is neither — it is fees that never appear in the tariff schedule at all.

One habit worth building: when you dispute a number, name the document first. “Your invoice line 4 shows $412 more than the schedule rate on my classification” is a conversation that ends in five minutes. “The tariff seems wrong” is a conversation that ends in a week.

The Stack: Why One Product Carries Four Government Charges

Take goods from China entering the United States. Four separate charges can appear on a single entry, and only two of them are tariffs in any strict sense.

Layer one is the ordinary rate — the normal-trade-relations column in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, tied to your classification. For “other” plastic household articles under HTSUS 3924.90.56 that rate is 3.4%.

Layer two is the trade-action rate. This is what people mean when they say “the China tariffs”. It lives in chapter 99 of the schedule, and the wording matters enormously. HTSUS heading 9903.88.01 — the List 1 heading — reads: “The duty provided in the applicable subheading plus 25%.” Heading 9903.88.15, covering List 4A, reads “the duty provided in the applicable subheading + 7.5%.”

Read those two sentences carefully, because the entire misunderstanding lives in one word. The schedule does not say “25% instead of”. It says plus. Your goods keep their ordinary rate and gain an additional one. On our plastic housewares, that is not 25% — it is 3.4% + 25% = 28.4% in duty alone, before a single fee is added.

Layers three and four are fees, and they are the cleanest illustration of “a duty that is not a tariff”. The merchandise processing fee is set by regulation, not by the tariff schedule: 19 CFR 24.23 fixes it at “an ad valorem fee of 0.3464 percent” on formal entries. It has a floor and a ceiling that are adjusted for inflation each year. For fiscal year 2026, CBP set the minimum at $33.58 and the maximum at $651.50, with a $4.03 surcharge if the entry is filed manually — an adjustment reflecting a 2.59% CPI-U increase, in force since 1 October 2025.

The harbor maintenance fee is separate again, and narrower: 19 CFR 24.24 sets “a port use fee of 0.125 percent (.00125) of its value” on commercial cargo loaded or unloaded at a US port. Note the trigger — it is a port fee. Air freight does not attract it, which is one of the few places where air quietly claws back a fraction of its cost disadvantage.

Worked Example: The Same Yiwu Carton, Landed in the US and in the UK

Here is the arithmetic end to end, so you can rerun it with your own numbers. The goods are plastic household articles — a Yiwu district staple — with a declared customs value of $40,000, shipped by sea, entered as one formal entry. Every rate below is read from the published schedules, not from a private invoice.

The headline number a supplier would have given you was 25%. Duty alone is 28.4%, and once the two fees are added the number you actually owe CBP is 28.87% of declared value. That gap of 3.87 percentage points — $1,548.56 here — is not a hidden fee or a broker markup. Every cent of it is published, and none of it is optional.

Now the same cartons into the United Kingdom. The commodity code is 3924900090, and the third-country duty against ERGA OMNES — which is the column that applies to Chinese-origin goods, since the UK has no preferential agreement with China — is 6.00%. There is no Section 301 equivalent, and no MPF or HMF. Duty is $2,400 on the same $40,000, before import VAT.

Read the two together and you have the single most useful fact in this article: the same physical goods carry 28.87% into one market and 6.00% into another. A “tariff rate” quoted without a destination is not a number, it is a rumour. If you sell into several markets, your duty line is not a constant you can carry across a pricing sheet.

If you buy from six or eight stalls in the Yiwu market and each ships separately, you are not just paying more freight — you are filing more entries, and each one carries its own fee floor and its own broker charge. Consolidation is usually discussed as a freight decision. It is a duty-line decision too.

The Charge on the Chinese Side Nobody Quotes You: Export VAT and the Fapiao

Every page ranking for this question treats duty as something that happens at the destination. For anyone buying out of Yiwu, that is only half the shipment, and the half that gets ignored is the one that moves your FOB price.

China levies VAT at 13% on goods domestically, and refunds it on export — the export VAT refund, which for general manufactured goods including plastic products, textiles and furniture sits at the full 13% tier. The refund is the reason a Chinese export price can look lower than the same goods sold domestically. It is not a discount anyone is giving you; it is tax coming back out of the chain.

Two constraints decide whether that money is actually recovered, and both are invisible from outside China. First, the refund belongs to the Chinese-registered entity that made the export customs declaration — not to you, not to your agent unless the agent is the declarant. Second, and this is the one that catches people, it can only be claimed against a special VAT fapiao from the supplier showing the input VAT paid. A plain fapiao or a commercial invoice does not qualify.

Why this bites harder in the Futian market than anywhere else

Here is why that matters specifically in Yiwu. A very large share of the Futian market is traded by small-scale taxpayers — individual stall operators, not general-taxpayer companies. Many of them simply cannot issue a special VAT fapiao. When that happens the export refund on those goods is unclaimable, and the value of the lost refund does not vanish; it gets absorbed into the price somewhere. Sometimes the stall prices it in openly. Sometimes an export agent absorbs it and recovers it in the service fee. Either way it is inside the FOB you are comparing.

So when two Yiwu suppliers quote noticeably different FOB prices for what looks like the identical item, the difference is not always quality or margin. It can be fapiao status. The question worth asking before you compare quotes is simply: can you issue a special VAT fapiao, and who is named as exporter of record on the declaration? Suppliers who deal with export buyers regularly will answer it in one line. A blank look is itself informative.

None of this is a charge you pay at your own border, which is precisely why it belongs in a discussion about duty and tariffs rather than outside it — it is a tax on the same shipment, decided before the goods leave. If you want the mechanics of who files what, our Yiwu consolidation and DDP shipping service page sets out which party acts as declarant on a consolidated load.

Check Your Own Rate in Five Minutes

Rates move. Trade actions are added and expire, exclusion lists are refreshed, and fee caps inflate every fiscal year. An article that hands you a number is worth less than one that hands you the procedure, so here is the procedure.

1. Get the classification first. Everything downstream depends on it. Not “plastic household goods” but a full code to the destination’s required digit count — six digits are internationally harmonised, the rest are national. If you are unsure, our guide to HS codes for Yiwu imports walks through classifying mixed market goods.
2. Look up the ordinary rate in the destination’s own schedule — the USITC HTS search for the US, the UK Trade Tariff service for Britain, TARIC for the EU. Use the destination’s tool, never a third-party summary, and never a rate someone quoted you in a chat.
3. Check for additional headings. In the US that means chapter 99 of the HTSUS. This is where trade-action rates and any active exclusions live, and it is the step most buyers skip. Exclusion lists change on their own timetable, so read the current chapter rather than trusting a figure from last quarter — including the one in this article.
4. Add the fees that match your transport mode. MPF on formal entries; HMF only if it arrives by sea.
5. Confirm origin, not just supplier address. Duty follows country of origin, which is a rule about where the goods were substantially transformed — not where they were bought, consolidated or shipped from. Goods bought in Yiwu are usually Chinese-origin, but a stall reselling imported components is not automatically so.

Two things this procedure will not settle. It gives you an estimate, not a ruling: only the destination customs authority can bind itself to a classification, and if the amounts are large enough to hurt when wrong, a binding ruling application is the cheap insurance. And it says nothing about timing — a classification the entry officer disagrees with does not usually mean a penalty, but it does mean the entry stops moving while it is resolved, which on a seasonal order is the expensive part. Our note on how long customs clearance takes covers what a query does to a timeline.

One current-year change worth flagging if you ship small parcels to Europe: the EU’s long-standing customs duty exemption for consignments up to €150 ended on 1 July 2026, replaced by a temporary flat customs duty of €3 per item, charged by tariff classification rather than per parcel or per unit of quantity. That regime runs until 1 July 2028. A good deal of the advice online still describes the old exemption, so verify against the Commission’s own guidance and legal text rather than a blog — including for anything you read about thresholds in this paragraph six months from now.

Which Term Should You Use, and When

The trade-off is between precision and being understood, and it resolves differently depending on who you are talking to.

With a broker or a customs authority, be precise. Say “duty” when you mean an assessed amount and name the entry; say “the rate under heading X” when you mean the schedule. Precision here is not pedantry — it is what makes a dispute resolvable, because the two of you can point at the same line.

With a supplier, expect looseness and do not correct it. When a Yiwu supplier says “tariff”, he almost always means the trade-action rate he has heard about from other buyers, and he is unlikely to know your classification or your fees. Take the number as a signal about which list your goods fall under, and do your own arithmetic.

With your own team, use “landed duty” or “total to customs” for the stacked figure, and never let a single percentage travel through a pricing sheet without the destination attached to it. Most of the pricing errors described in this article start as a correct number that was carried into the wrong market.

If what you actually need next is the full cost picture rather than the government charges alone, our landed cost formula for import buying decisions puts freight, insurance and handling around the duty stack described here, and the difference between quoting DDP and EXW decides which of these charges is yours to pay at all.

What to Put in the Email When You Ask Someone to Price This

Whether you are briefing an agent, a forwarder or your own broker, a duty quote is only as good as the five facts you supply with it. Send these and you get a real number back the same day; leave them out and you get a range that helps nobody.

• Product description and material range. Not “homeware” — the actual article, what it is made of, and the size or grade options you are ordering across. Classification turns on material and function, so a mixed carton of plastic and stainless items is two classifications and two rates, not an average of the two.
• Destination country, and every destination if there is more than one. As the worked example shows, this single field moves the answer from 6.00% to 28.87% on identical goods.
• Declared value and Incoterm. Say whether your figure is FOB or CIF and what it includes, because the duty base is calculated differently by different customs authorities and quoting the wrong base is the most common source of a duty estimate that misses.
• Transport mode. Sea or air decides whether the harbor maintenance fee applies at all.
• Whether you are consolidating. How many suppliers, and whether they clear as one entry or several — this drives the per-entry fee floor and, above roughly $188,077 of declared value, whether the fee cap binds.

Two things nobody can honestly put a number against before seeing that information, and you should be suspicious of anyone who does. There is no minimum order quantity for consolidation that holds in the abstract — it is governed by whether your suppliers’ cartons fill enough cubic metres to beat courier pricing, which is a question about your actual carton list rather than a published threshold. And a duty figure quoted without your classification is a guess — regardless of how confidently it is delivered. On classification, a working code with documented reasoning is the minimum a buyer should accept; for values large enough to hurt when wrong, only a binding ruling from the destination customs authority is reliable.

On timing, budget realistically. Sea transit from Ningbo runs 30–45 days on our own published LCL and FCL bands before clearance even begins, against 8–12 days by air cargo and 18–25 by rail into Europe — and a classification query at the border adds days to weeks on top of whichever you pick. That is why a duty question is a scheduling question as much as a costing one. Where the paperwork gets checked also matters: our pre-shipment inspection returns a PDF within 24 hours of the visit, which is early enough to correct a description or a declared value while the cartons are still in Yiwu rather than after they have landed.

Часто задаваемые вопросы